<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>judgesonmerit.org &#187; education</title>
	<atom:link href="http://judgesonmerit.org/tag/education/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://judgesonmerit.org</link>
	<description>Making the move to merit selection for all appellate judges in Pennsylvania</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:25:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Merit Selection &#8211; A Better Solution</title>
		<link>http://judgesonmerit.org/2008/06/02/is-more-voter-education-the-answer/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://judgesonmerit.org/2008/06/02/is-more-voter-education-the-answer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 20:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shira</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Perspective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merit Selection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://judgesonmerit.org/?p=124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes, we&#8217;re asked whether it&#8217;s possible to fix the electoral system, rather than changing to Merit Selection. Our critics often argue that we&#8217;d do better to improve voter education when it comes to judicial elections. We agree that voter education is a critical issue, and PMC spends considerable time, energy and resources on voter education [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes, we&#8217;re asked whether it&#8217;s possible to fix the electoral system, rather than changing to Merit Selection.  Our critics often argue that we&#8217;d do better to improve voter education when it comes to judicial elections.  We agree that voter education is a critical issue, and PMC spends considerable time, energy and resources on voter education initiatives during judicial election cycles.  But, we remain convinced that even greatly improved voter education isn&#8217;t enough to salvage the elective system. We&#8217;re not alone in this assessment.</p>
<p>Blogger David Giacalone at <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/05/28/would-an-educated-public-improve-judicial-elections/" target="_blank">f/k/a</a> parses a discussion about the benefits of increased voter education, and reasons that Merit Selection is the best way to overcome the influence of money on judicial selection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://judgesonmerit.org/2008/06/02/is-more-voter-education-the-answer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
