<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for judgesonmerit.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://judgesonmerit.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://judgesonmerit.org</link>
	<description>Making the move to merit selection for all appellate judges in Pennsylvania</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:34:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Money Rollin&#8217; In, Credibility Rollin&#8217; Out: The Citizens United Decision and the PA Judiciary by Gavel Grab &#187; Citizens United: Media Round-Up</title>
		<link>http://judgesonmerit.org/2010/01/25/money-rollin-in-credibility-rollin-out-the-citizens-united-decision-and-the-pa-judiciary/comment-page-1/#comment-1677</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavel Grab &#187; Citizens United: Media Round-Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://judgesonmerit.org/?p=657#comment-1677</guid>
		<description>[...] states, try the Rapid City Journal in South Dakota, MinnPost.com from Minnesota, our friends at JudgesonMerit.org in Pennsylvania, and Progress [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] states, try the Rapid City Journal in South Dakota, MinnPost.com from Minnesota, our friends at JudgesonMerit.org in Pennsylvania, and Progress [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Money Rollin&#8217; In, Credibility Rollin&#8217; Out: The Citizens United Decision and the PA Judiciary by Gavel Grab &#187; Citizens United</title>
		<link>http://judgesonmerit.org/2010/01/25/money-rollin-in-credibility-rollin-out-the-citizens-united-decision-and-the-pa-judiciary/comment-page-1/#comment-1675</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavel Grab &#187; Citizens United</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://judgesonmerit.org/?p=657#comment-1675</guid>
		<description>[...] JudgesOnMerit: Money Rollin? In, Credibility Rollin? Out: The Citizens United Decision and the PA Judiciary Susan &#8211; 1/25/2010 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] JudgesOnMerit: Money Rollin? In, Credibility Rollin? Out: The Citizens United Decision and the PA Judiciary Susan &#8211; 1/25/2010 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Historic U.S. Supreme Court Decision Will Let the Money Roll In to PA Judicial Elections by Mary Jo Graham</title>
		<link>http://judgesonmerit.org/2010/01/21/historic-u-s-supreme-court-decision-will-let-the-money-roll-in-to-pa-judicial-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-1668</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Jo Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://judgesonmerit.org/?p=634#comment-1668</guid>
		<description>Thank you all for keeping me apprised. This information is invaluable, but only if I do something with the information. Thanks, again...M.J. Graham</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you all for keeping me apprised. This information is invaluable, but only if I do something with the information. Thanks, again&#8230;M.J. Graham</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on O’Connor Judicial Selection Initiative Pushes for Merit by dave palmer</title>
		<link>http://judgesonmerit.org/2009/12/16/o%e2%80%99connor-judicial-selection-initiative-pushes-for-merit/comment-page-1/#comment-1666</link>
		<dc:creator>dave palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://judgesonmerit.org/?p=551#comment-1666</guid>
		<description>Recent article re: Ohio Chief Justice Thomas Moyer and merit selection of judges can be found at the URL below. 

Chief Justice Thomas Moyer – Hypocrisy/Arrogance re: Merit Selection of Judges
http://tinyurl.com/yknqp9m</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recent article re: Ohio Chief Justice Thomas Moyer and merit selection of judges can be found at the URL below. </p>
<p>Chief Justice Thomas Moyer – Hypocrisy/Arrogance re: Merit Selection of Judges<br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/yknqp9m" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/yknqp9m</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Should Judicial Candidates be Permitted to Deceive the Public to Get Elected? by Court chasing its tail in Wisconsin &#124; judgesonmerit.org</title>
		<link>http://judgesonmerit.org/2009/09/18/should-judicial-candidates-be-permitted-to-deceive-the-public-to-get-elected/comment-page-1/#comment-1663</link>
		<dc:creator>Court chasing its tail in Wisconsin &#124; judgesonmerit.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://judgesonmerit.org/?p=470#comment-1663</guid>
		<description>[...] with requests that Justice Michael Gabelman recuse himself from all criminal cases because of statements he made during his campaign that basically equated defending accused criminals with supporting crime. The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with requests that Justice Michael Gabelman recuse himself from all criminal cases because of statements he made during his campaign that basically equated defending accused criminals with supporting crime. The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Want a Role for the People &#8212; Try Merit Selection by pennsylvania</title>
		<link>http://judgesonmerit.org/2008/06/15/want-a-role-for-the-people-try-merit-selection/comment-page-1/#comment-1593</link>
		<dc:creator>pennsylvania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://judgesonmerit.org/?p=141#comment-1593</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;pennsylvania...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic judgesonmerit.org &quot; Want a Role for the People — Try Merit ... was interesting....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>pennsylvania&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic judgesonmerit.org &#8221; Want a Role for the People — Try Merit &#8230; was interesting&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Records May Be Set by 2009 PA Supreme Court Election by Clear Evidence for Judicial Selection Reform &#124; judgesonmerit.org</title>
		<link>http://judgesonmerit.org/2009/12/22/new-records-may-be-set-by-2009-pa-supreme-court-election/comment-page-1/#comment-1583</link>
		<dc:creator>Clear Evidence for Judicial Selection Reform &#124; judgesonmerit.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 14:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://judgesonmerit.org/?p=554#comment-1583</guid>
		<description>[...] case for reforming the way Pennsylvania selects its judges keeps getting stronger.&#8221;  Citing PMC&#8217;s analysis of the fundraising and spending in the 2009 Supreme Court election, the editorial focuses on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] case for reforming the way Pennsylvania selects its judges keeps getting stronger.&#8221;  Citing PMC&#8217;s analysis of the fundraising and spending in the 2009 Supreme Court election, the editorial focuses on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Records May Be Set by 2009 PA Supreme Court Election by judgesonmerit.org &#187; Times-Tribune: Change to Merit Selection</title>
		<link>http://judgesonmerit.org/2009/12/22/new-records-may-be-set-by-2009-pa-supreme-court-election/comment-page-1/#comment-1540</link>
		<dc:creator>judgesonmerit.org &#187; Times-Tribune: Change to Merit Selection</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 19:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://judgesonmerit.org/?p=554#comment-1540</guid>
		<description>[...] editorial in the Times-Tribune of Scranton quotes PMC&#8217;s analysis of the cost of the 2009 Pennsylvania Supreme Court election, noting: Pennsylvania once again leads [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] editorial in the Times-Tribune of Scranton quotes PMC&#8217;s analysis of the cost of the 2009 Pennsylvania Supreme Court election, noting: Pennsylvania once again leads [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Merit Selection: The 2009-2010 Bills by judgesonmerit.org &#187; PA Judges Come With High Price Tags</title>
		<link>http://judgesonmerit.org/about-this-campaign/merit-selection-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-1524</link>
		<dc:creator>judgesonmerit.org &#187; PA Judges Come With High Price Tags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://judgesonmerit.org/about-this-campaign/#comment-1524</guid>
		<description>[...] from elections to merit selection requires a change in the state constitution. There is current legislation pending in both the House and Senate to achieve such an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from elections to merit selection requires a change in the state constitution. There is current legislation pending in both the House and Senate to achieve such an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Merck Stays Out of Judicial Campaign Contribution Game by Twitter Trackbacks for judgesonmerit.org » Merck Stays Out of Judicial Campaign Contribution Game [judgesonmerit.org] on Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://judgesonmerit.org/2009/12/21/merck-stays-out-of-judicial-campaign-contribution-game/comment-page-1/#comment-1518</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Trackbacks for judgesonmerit.org » Merck Stays Out of Judicial Campaign Contribution Game [judgesonmerit.org] on Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 01:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://judgesonmerit.org/?p=553#comment-1518</guid>
		<description>[...] judgesonmerit.org » Merck Stays Out of Judicial Campaign Contribution Game  judgesonmerit.org/2009/12/21/merck-stays-out-of-judicial-campaign-contribution-game &#8211; view page &#8211; cached  Some friends in the corporate world share our concerns about the role of money in judicial elections. Merck VP, Charles R. Grezlak, told the Center for Political Accountability, a nonprofit group working towards greater transparency in political spending, that the pharmaceutical company would no longer make donations to state supreme court candidates. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] judgesonmerit.org » Merck Stays Out of Judicial Campaign Contribution Game  judgesonmerit.org/2009/12/21/merck-stays-out-of-judicial-campaign-contribution-game &ndash; view page &ndash; cached  Some friends in the corporate world share our concerns about the role of money in judicial elections. Merck VP, Charles R. Grezlak, told the Center for Political Accountability, a nonprofit group working towards greater transparency in political spending, that the pharmaceutical company would no longer make donations to state supreme court candidates. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
