<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Letter That Didn&#8217;t Make It Into the Wall Street Journal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://judgesonmerit.org/2008/08/26/a-letter-that-didnt-make-it-into-the-wall-street-journal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://judgesonmerit.org/2008/08/26/a-letter-that-didnt-make-it-into-the-wall-street-journal/</link>
	<description>Making the move to merit selection for all appellate judges in Pennsylvania</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gavel Grab &#187; links for 2008-08-27</title>
		<link>http://judgesonmerit.org/2008/08/26/a-letter-that-didnt-make-it-into-the-wall-street-journal/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavel Grab &#187; links for 2008-08-27</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 13:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://judgesonmerit.org/?p=203#comment-338</guid>
		<description>[...] judgesonmerit.org » A Letter That Didn’t Make It Into the Wall Street Journal [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] judgesonmerit.org » A Letter That Didn’t Make It Into the Wall Street Journal [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Hall</title>
		<link>http://judgesonmerit.org/2008/08/26/a-letter-that-didnt-make-it-into-the-wall-street-journal/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://judgesonmerit.org/?p=203#comment-329</guid>
		<description>This letter does a terrific job of laying out issues that the Journal prefers to ignore in its recent spate of writings on merit selection. I've posted this at Justice at Stake's Gavel Grab blog, which also has several postings on the Journal's editorials and the response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This letter does a terrific job of laying out issues that the Journal prefers to ignore in its recent spate of writings on merit selection. I&#8217;ve posted this at Justice at Stake&#8217;s Gavel Grab blog, which also has several postings on the Journal&#8217;s editorials and the response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavel Grab &#187; Pa. Reform Group Responds to Journal</title>
		<link>http://judgesonmerit.org/2008/08/26/a-letter-that-didnt-make-it-into-the-wall-street-journal/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavel Grab &#187; Pa. Reform Group Responds to Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://judgesonmerit.org/?p=203#comment-328</guid>
		<description>[...] full text of the letter is at PMC&#8217;s blog, www.Judgesonmerit.com. &#160;Email This [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] full text of the letter is at PMC&#8217;s blog, <a href="http://www.Judgesonmerit.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.Judgesonmerit.com</a>. &nbsp;Email This [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
